IS IT A GOOD IDEA to support Mothers or Fathers even, who irresponsibly bring children into the world.. without proper care for hygiene, health, financial support or even conveniences. Let alone mentioning the morality of the issue of persons who are living immoral lifestyles, choosing to raise children in homes that are likely to encourage more of the same unsociable, criminal behavior patterns that their parents have already demonstrated they are unwilling or unable to discontinue. Persons who are in a situation where they are involved in Criminal, high--risk activities or lifestyles are not likely to be recommended as good parent material. When they purposely choose to be impregnated in order to obtain public sympathy for themselves when they know they are WANTED for serious offences, the problem becomes extreme. Are they to be allowed to continue to use their children as a human shield in potentially hazardous places and life-threatening situations, should this be encouraged?!!
Or should the Authorities that protect Children's Rights and families consider taking the children into care, as the law states that the Welfare and Safety of the Children is Paramount?
Is it a good idea to promote or propagate information, or even encourage spreading of propaganda against innocent persons, based on the grounds that this person who is pregnant has a higher need or right to access public services including but not limited to, housing, poor relief, food and other charitable donations, Legal services etc.
Does a person who has blatantly taken advantage of their knowledge of the system serve the Greater good, the interests of National Security, Public Safety, if they are allowed to discriminate against other persons based on the fact that they are pregnant and would like to fulfill a personal vendetta against someone who they have attempted to sabotage and feels that the only possible way they can gain more support or sympathy is to be pregnant. Does this country support criminals, abusing their Justice system and Public Services when they actually have no real need for the financial aid or support. These persons are only attempting to portray themselves as innocent but they indeed do have access to resources that they have acquired illegally and have purposely, irresponsibly put themselves in this situation and are now requesting aid or assistance only in order to maintain the illusion of innocence and purposely attempt to superceed the rights of another citizen.
Does the law operate in a manner of supporting spending taxpayers money, draining our already fragile economy to support personal agendas,criminal behavior, bullying, harassment or favoritism not to mention the wasting of our already limited public services without any conscience for those who are really in need?
I firmly believe in respecting and protecting the rights of all citizens, however if any hierarchy is established in terms of rights to access services; it should be given to positive, innocent, professional, constructive, mentally stable persons with no criminal history and no known personality or behavioral disorders. Encouraging persons to abuse the system, in our current economy is unfeasible and irresponsible, as that could be very costly, in monetary terms, as well as taxing on resources to any organisation that interacts with persons with such a blatant disregard for the needs of other citizens and who has obvious, serious anarchic tendencies.
No comments:
Post a Comment